Earth system justice needed to identify and live within Earth system boundaries

  • Piketty, T. Capital in the Twenty-First Century (The Belknap Press of Harvard Univ. Press, 2014).

  • Ribot, J. Cause and response: vulnerability and climate in the Anthropocene. J. Peasant Stud. 41, 667–705 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rockström, J. et al. Identifying a safe and just corridor for people and the planet. Earths Future 9, e2020EF001866 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehrabi, Z., Ellis, E. C. & Ramankutty, N. The challenge of feeding the world while conserving half the planet. Nat. Sustain. 1, 409–412 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinz, S., Otto, I. M., Tan, R., Jin, Y. & Glebe, T. W. Cooperation enhances adaptation to environmental uncertainty: evidence from irrigation behavioral experiments in South China. Water 14, 1098 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sultana, F. Critical climate justice. Geogr. J. 188, 118–124 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dirth, E., Biermann, F. & Kalfagianni, A. What do researchers mean when talking about justice? An empirical review of justice narratives in global change research. Earth Syst. Gov. 6, 100042 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klinsky, S. et al. Why equity is fundamental in climate change policy research. Glob. Environ. Change 44, 170–173 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grasso, M. & Tàbara, J. D. Towards a moral compass to guide sustainability transformations in a high-end climate change world. Sustainability 11, 2971 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotzé, L. A global environmental constitution for the Anthropocene? Transnatl. Environ. Law 8, 11–33 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kothari, S. & Parajuli, P. in Global Ecology: A New Arena of Political Conflict (ed. Sachs, W.) Ch. 16 (Zed Books, 1993).

  • Whyte, K. Too late for indigenous climate justice: ecological and relational tipping points. WIREs Clim. Change 11, e603 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okereke, C. Global Justice and Neoliberal Environmental Governance: Ethics, Sustainable Development and International Co-operation (Routledge, 2007).

  • Gupta, J. & Lebel, L. Access and allocation in earth system governance: lessons learnt in the context of the Sustainable Development Goals. Int. Environ. Agreem. 20, 393–410 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biermann, F. & Kalfagianni, A. Planetary justice: a research framework. Earth Syst. Gov. 6, 100049 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bullard, R. D. Solid waste sites and the black Houston community. Sociol. Inq. 53, 273–288 (1983).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, K., McCauley, D., Heffron, R., Stephan, H. & Rehner, R. Energy justice: a conceptual review. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 11, 174–182 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartwig, L. D., Jackson, S., Markham, F. & Osborne, N. Water colonialism and Indigenous water justice in south-eastern Australia. Int. J. Water Resour. Dev. 38, 30–63 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Alier, J., Temper, L., Del Bene, D. & Scheidel, A. Is there a global environmental justice movement? J. Peasant Stud. 43, 731–755 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Climate Change Litigation Databases (Sabin Center for Climate Change Law, 2022).

  • Schlosberg, D. & Collins, L. B. From environmental to climate justice: climate change and the discourse of environmental justice. WIREs Clim. Change 5, 359–374 (2014).

  • Taylor, P. Respect for Nature (Princeton Univ. Press, 1986).

  • Ogar, E., Pecl, G. & Mustonen, T. Science must embrace traditional and indigenous knowledge to solve our biodiversity crisis. One Earth 3, 162–165 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leach, M. et al. Equity and sustainability in the Anthropocene: a social–ecological systems perspective on their intertwined futures. Glob. Sustain. 1, E13 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pascual, U. et al. Governing for transformative change across the biodiversity–climate–society nexus. BioScience 72, 684–704 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Making Peace With Nature: A Scientific Blueprint to Tackle the Climate, Biodiversity and Pollution Emergencies (UNEP, 2021).

  • Raworth, K. A doughnut for the Anthropocene: humanity’s compass in the 21st century. Lancet Planet. Health 1, e48–e49 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rammelt, C. F. et al. Impacts of meeting minimum access on critical earth systems amidst the Great Inequality. Nat. Sustain. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-022-00995-5 (2022).

  • IPCC Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5°C (ed. Masson-Delmotte, V. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2022).

  • Martin, A. et al. Justice and conservation: the need to incorporate recognition. Biol. Conserv. 197, 254–261 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruano-Chamorro, C., Gurney, G. G. & Cinner, J. E. Advancing procedural justice in conservation. Conserv. Lett. 15.3, e12861 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fricker, M. Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing (Oxford Univ. Press, 2007).

  • Newell, P., Srivastava, S., Naess, L. O., Torres Contreras, G. A. & Price, R. Toward transformative climate justice: an emerging research agenda. WIREs Clim. Change 12.6, e733 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Klinsky, S. An initial scoping of transitional justice for global climate governance. Clim. Policy 18, 752–765 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosch, H. J. & Gupta, J. Water property rights in investor-state contracts on extractive activities, affects water governance: an empirical assessment of 80 contracts in Africa and Asia. Rev. Eur. Comp. Int. Environ. Law 31, 295–316 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamont, J. (ed.) Distributive justice (Routledge, 2017).

  • Fuchs, D. A. et al. Consumption Corridors: Living a Good Life Within Sustainable Limits (Routledge, 2021).

  • Peel, J. & Osofsky, H. M. A rights turn in climate change litigation? Transnatl. Environ. Law 7, 37–67 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hickel, J., O’Neill, D. W., Fanning, A. L. & Zoomkawala, H. National responsibility for ecological breakdown: a fair-shares assessment of resource use, 1970–2017. Lancet Planet. Health 6, e342–e349 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marion Suiseeya, K. R., Elhard, D. K. & Paul, C. J. Toward a relational approach in global climate governance: exploring the role of trust. WIREs Clim. Change 12.4, e712 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Caney, S. Human rights, climate change, and discounting. Environ. Politics 17, 536–555 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, K. Settler colonialism, ecology, and environmental injustice. Environ. Soc. 9, 125–144 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okereke, C. Global environmental sustainability: intragenerational equity and conceptions of justice in multilateral environmental regimes. Geoforum 37, 725–738 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciplet, D. & Roberts, J. T. Splintering South: ecologically unequal exchange theory in a fragmented global climate. J. World Syst. Res. 23, 372–398 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brock, G. in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (ed. Zalta, E. N.) (Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford Univ., 2021).

  • Bell, D. in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (ed. Zalta, E. N.) (Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford Univ., 2020).

  • Khelifa, R. & Mahdjoub, H. An intersectionality lens is needed to establish a global view of equity, diversity and inclusion. Ecol. Lett. 25, 1049–1054 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malin, S. A. & Ryder, S. S. Developing deeply intersectional environmental justice scholarship. Environ. Sociol. 4, 1–7 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tremmel, J. C. A Theory of Intergenerational Justice (Routledge, 2009).

  • Otto, I. M. et al. Human agency in the Anthropocene. Ecol. Econ. 167, 106463 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winter, C. J. Does time colonise intergenerational environmental justice theory? Environ. Politics 29, 278–296 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckersley, R. The Green State: Rethinking Democracy and Sovereignty (MIT Press, 2004).

  • Srinivasan, K. & Kasturirangan, R. Political ecology, development, and human exceptionalism. Geoforum 75, 125–128 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, P. in Animal Rights (ed. Garner, R.) 7–18 (Palgrave Macmillan, 1973).

  • Pellow, D. N. What is Critical Environmental Justice? (John Wiley & Sons, 2017).

  • Nussbaum, M. C. Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership (Belknap Press, 2006).

  • Hickey, C. & Robeyns, I. Planetary justice: what can we learn from ethics and political philosophy? Earth Syst. Gov. 6, 100045 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Celermajer, D. et al. Justice through a multispecies lens. Contemp. Polit. Theory 19, 475–512 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tschakert, P. More-than-human solidarity and multispecies justice in the climate crisis. Environ. Polit. 31, 277–296 (2022).

  • Knauß, S. Conceptualizing human stewardship in the Anthropocene: the rights of nature in Ecuador, New Zealand and India. J. Agric. Environ. Ethics 31, 703–722 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramarz, T. Extractive industry disasters and community responses: a typology of vulnerable subjects. Environ. Polit. 31, 89–109 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byskov, M. F. & Hyams, K. Epistemic injustice in climate adaptation. Ethical Theory Moral Pract. 25, 613–634 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santos, B. D. S. Another knowledge is possible: beyond northern epistemologies (Verso Books, 2008).

  • Weiss, E. B. Climate change, intergenerational equity, and international law. Vt. J. Environ. Law 9, 615–627 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rio Declaration on Environment and Development A/CONF.151/26 (Vol. I) (UNCED, 1992).

  • Holland, B. Procedural justice in local climate adaptation: political capabilities and transformational change. Environ. Polit. 26, 391–412 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, J., Gupta, A. & Vegelin, C. Equity, justice and the SDGs: lessons learnt from two decades of INEA scholarship. Int. Environ. Agreem. 22, 393–409 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siurua, H. Nature above people: Rolston and “Fortress” conservation in the South. Ethics Environ. 11, 71–96 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphries, P. et al. Riverscape recruitment: a conceptual synthesis of drivers of fish recruitment in rivers. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 77, 213–225 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Mara, K. et al. Connectivity of fish communities in a tropical floodplain river system and predicted impacts of potential new dams. Sci. Total Environ. 788, 147785 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNEP. Technical Summary – Global Environment Outlook (GEO-6): Healthy Planet, Healthy People (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2020).

  • McIntyre, O. The current state of development of the no significant harm principle: how far have we come? Int. Environ. Agreem. 20, 601–618 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robeyns, I. What, if anything, is wrong with extreme wealth?. J. Hum. Dev. Capabil. 20, 251–266 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sovacool, B. K. et al. Sustainable minerals and metals for a low-carbon future. Science 367, 30–33 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Related Posts